Nikolay Kondratyuk General of the FSO. Generals of the Rublevsky expanses. What is known about Kondratyuk
The FSO receives a free right to aircraft and other vessels - first reading. Andrey Svintsov How will the owners report later? Alexey Kurinny Recorded free of charge, the burden will fall on passengers Was there really no ban on foreign real estate before? Hartung You can block the operation of any facility and liquidate it as a business. And in principle, SR will support the bill.
10. 99654-7 The State Duma, as a result of discussion, approved the first reading bill “On amendments to the Federal Law “On State Security” and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation” (aimed at increasing the efficiency of the activities of state security authorities in ensuring the safety of state security facilities and protecting protected objects ).
The document was introduced on February 11, 2017 by the President.
Presented by State Secretary - Deputy Director of the FSO Nikolai Kondratyuk.
Chairman of the Committee on Security and Anti-Corruption Vasily Piskarev.
The bill proposes:
1) grant state security bodies the right to:
- use airports, airfields, heliports, landing sites, sea and river ports free of charge, as well as receive flight and navigation support free of charge;
- ensure the security of parked aircraft and other vehicles used for transport services or ensuring the security of state security facilities;
- temporarily restrict or prohibit the movement of vehicles and pedestrians on the routes of passage of state security facilities;
2) provide that citizens of the Russian Federation cannot be hired or employed by state security bodies also in the following cases: they have a criminal record (including expunged or expunged); exemption from criminal liability on non-rehabilitative grounds; carrying out business activities; use of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances without a doctor’s prescription, as well as new potentially dangerous psychoactive substances;
3) clarify the procedure for seconding military personnel of state security agencies to state bodies and organizations, the rules for the use of physical force, special means and weapons by employees of state security agencies, as well as the procedure for the alienation of property registered to them outside the Russian Federation;
4) establish the specifics of serving in state security agencies, while for certain categories of employees of state security agencies, an irregular working day and annual additional leave of up to 10 days are established;
5) legislate that the service ID of an employee of the state security authorities is a document confirming the identity, position, rights and powers granted to the employee of the state security authorities by this Federal Law, other Federal Laws and other regulatory legal acts of Russia, as well as the right to store and bear arms and special means;
6) supplement the list of persons subject to mandatory state fingerprint registration with employees of state security agencies;
7) not to extend the application of the Merchant Shipping Code of the Russian Federation and the Inland Water Transport Code of the Russian Federation to ships used for the purposes of transport services and (or) ensuring the safety of state security facilities;
8) provide for the coordination of mandatory regulations in the seaport with the Federal Security Service of Russia in the event that the seaport, naval base or location of ships used for transport services or ensuring the security of state security facilities have adjacent water areas.
First reading 418 0 1 12:37
Transcript of discussion
10th question. On the draft federal law "On Amendments to the Federal Law "On State Security" and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation." Report of the official representative of the President of the Russian Federation, Secretary of State - Deputy Director of the Federal Security Service Nikolai Fedorovich Kondratyuk. Please.
Kondratyuk N.F., official representative of the President of the Russian Federation, State Secretary - Deputy Director of the Federal Security Service.
Dear Alexander Dmitrievich! Dear deputies!
More than five years have passed since the last significant changes were made to the Federal Law “On State Security”. During this period, the legislation of the Russian Federation, including in the field of defense, state security and law enforcement, was significantly reformed and improved, numerous changes were made to legislative acts regulating the activities of state bodies in ensuring security, the powers of these bodies and issues of ensuring their activities.
At the same time, this period is also characterized by a complicated foreign policy situation. Attempts by radical forces to influence the internal political situation in the Russian Federation do not stop. The state as a whole, public authorities and citizens are faced with new challenges and threats. These complex and extraordinary conditions raise the need to improve the legislative framework and increase the efficiency of the activities of state security bodies to ensure the safety of state security facilities and the protection of protected objects, as well as the staffing of these bodies and the procedure for serving and working.
In this regard, the draft federal law “On Amendments to the Federal Law “On State Security” and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation” submitted by the President of the Russian Federation to the State Duma has important practical significance for the implementation of the tasks facing state security authorities.
The changes proposed by the bill are aimed both at improving legal regulation and fulfilling the tasks of the Federal Security Service of Russia for the purpose and related powers of state security bodies, and at strengthening military and labor discipline, as well as optimizing and staffing state security bodies.
Thus, in particular, the project provides for clarification of the concept of “protected object”, changing the list of persons from among foreign citizens subject to state protection, defining as a measure of state protection the provision of communications to the object of state security for the needs of state security authorities, vesting state security authorities with a number of additional rights related to the implementation of state protection.
In addition, the bill contains provisions clarifying the procedure for employees of state security agencies when using physical force, special means and weapons, as well as rules expanding the list of grounds for refusal to enroll in military service or employment and dismissal from service or employment.
The bill intends to supplement the Federal Law “On State Security” with an article establishing the requirements, obligations, prohibitions and restrictions associated with military service in state security agencies, and responsibility for their failure to comply, as well as a provision on irregular working hours for management personnel and certain categories employees, based on the specifics of the activities of the FSO of Russia, and the need to comply with the principle of continuity in the implementation of state protection and to provide them with additional annual leave.
The implementation of the bill will not require additional allocation of federal budget funds and will be carried out within the budget allocations provided for in the federal budget for state security agencies.
The adoption of the bill will not entail negative socio-economic consequences and will not require changes, suspension, adoption or recognition as invalid of other legislative acts of the Russian Federation, except those specified in the bill, as well as regulatory legal acts of the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation.
The bill complies with the provisions of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union and other international treaties of the Russian Federation and will not affect the achievement of the goals of the state program of the Russian Federation.
I believe it is necessary to emphasize once again that the introduction of the changes proposed by the bill will help to increase the efficiency of the activities of state security authorities in ensuring the security of state security facilities and the protection of protected objects, carried out for the purposes of security and the unhindered exercise of state power in the Russian Federation and the fulfillment of international obligations by the Russian Federation.
In connection with the above, I ask the State Duma to support the bill and pass it in the first reading.
Co-report by Vasily Ivanovich Piskarev. Please.
Piskarev V.I., Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Security and Anti-Corruption, UNITED RUSSIA faction.
Thanks a lot.
Dear Alexander Dmitrievich, colleagues!
Official representative of the President Nikolai Fedorovich Kondratyuk outlined the concept of the bill in detail and comprehensively. In addition to what has been said, I would like to focus on the following.
The current Federal Law “On State Security” was adopted back in 1996, and since that time there have been practically no changes to this law on issues of rights, powers and staffing.
Therefore, the bill proposes to vest state security agencies with powers that are currently already vested in other special services and law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation.
In particular, by analogy with the FSB of Russia and the National Guard, the bill proposes to give state security agencies the right to free use of airfields, landing sites of sea and river ports, regardless of their form of ownership.
An important addition is the clarification of the rules for the use of physical force, special means and weapons, similar to how this process is regulated in the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the National Guard.
Thus, an additional guarantee appears that excludes the unreasonable use of physical force, special equipment and weapons.
In addition, the bill proposes to expand the list of cases in the event of which the right to use available means arises, including vehicles, when an emergency arises, or when the necessary defense arises and in the absence of the possibility of using special means.
It is worth noting that the FSB of Russia, the Russian National Guard and the police have similar rights.
And no less important, colleagues, is the addition of this tightening of requirements for citizens who enter service in state security agencies, as well as those who are already serving. The requirements for strict compliance with the Code of Ethics and Official Conduct are increasing, and the requirements for strict compliance with other rights and obligations are increasing. There are a number of restrictions and conditions, non-compliance with which excludes service in state security agencies.
Thus, the bill is aimed solely at increasing the efficiency of state security activities. The adoption of the bill will not require additional funding from the federal budget. The Legal Department of the State Duma Apparatus also has no conceptual comments on the bill.
The bill was considered at a meeting of the Security and Anti-Corruption Committee on March 23 of this year and was unanimously supported.
Dear colleagues, I ask you to support the decision of the relevant committee and pass the bill in the first reading.
Thank you for your attention.
Chairman. Thank you.
Will there be any questions?
Turn on question recording mode.
Show the list.
Neil o v Oleg Anatolyevich, please.
Nilov O. A., faction "A JUST RUSSIA".
Question for Nikolai Fedorovich. Dear Nikolai Fedorovich! If it’s a small state secret, can you name how many objects of state protection we have, meaning officials, if possible, show it in dynamics, how this number changes, increases, decreases? Well, there are proposals, for example, to reduce the number of such officials, including our various bills, to reduce them to almost several dozen.
In general, how do you feel about this in order, yes, to increase the capabilities of the security service, to increase protection, but by reducing the number of such officials? Well, of course, the corresponding reactions of many citizens are known when they stand in traffic jams for half an hour or more on the occasion of such officials being allowed to pass. Thank you.
Kondratyuk N. F. The number is determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it indicates who has the right to state protection, eight such persons are officially registered, the rest are all by order of the President of the Russian Federation, which... Since our state still carries out large international activities , a lot of leaders and representatives of various states come to us, so their number varies depending on the activity of our foreign policy activities.
If you personally need to quantify statistics, let me present them to you individually.
Chairman. Svintsov Andrey Nikolaevich. Svintsov A.N., LDPR faction. Dear Nikolai Fedorovich!
So you propose to add subparagraph 8 to Article 15, paragraph “b”, it says about the free use of airfields, heliports, and another phrase: “Ensuring their activities.” Now, if I understand correctly, or correct it, that is, this is probably the supply of fuel, maybe some other services.
Tell me, please, how will the owners, if they are private owners, then report to the tax and other authorities, to their shareholders? If I correctly interpreted your proposal regarding subparagraph 8, that, indeed, to ensure the safety of first persons, objects must be used free of charge, but then here is the further development of events from the point of view of the tax authority, how will they then explain all this ? Are there any certificates or anything else?
Kondratyuk N.F. I’ll tell you this. The point is that the state generally pays for services. The owners of private heliports and other infrastructure projects have relevant agreements in this regard.
In this case, the FSO is relieved of this burden of having direct relations with, so to speak, the owners of these enterprises. Thus, in this case, the Government of the Russian Federation pays for the same fuel, for the same services that are provided, just like the FSB, just like the Russian Guard.
Chairman. Turn on the central stand.
Piska roar V.I. Yes, the question also caused a discussion in the committee. We propose to hold separate consultations with the FSO on this item and regulate this situation either with amendments or another wording. By the second reading, colleagues, there will be a completely clear picture of how this paragraph of Article 10... 15 will be finally formulated. Chairman. Kurinny Alexey Vladimirovich. Kuriniii.iii A.V., Communist Party faction. Yes, in continuation, Nikolai Fedorovich.
Indeed, the law says it is free of charge; no compensation is provided there. And what you say, the FSO will not interact in any way with private, non-private - any joint stock companies, this suggests that the financial burden will still be there, and in the end it will be redistributed, which means, to the rest of the citizens, to passengers, with whom we are talking, and the FSO does not seem to require additional costs, as written in your financial and economic justification. I would like clarity, maybe not for the second reading, but now.
And secondly, with regard to the possibility of entire water bodies, the transfer of entire water bodies under protection, that is, accordingly, access to them will be limited or completely prohibited. What is meant by a water body in this provision, and how many of these water bodies are currently under protection or are planned to be taken under protection?
Well, one last thing. This is what concerns the ban on FSO employees owning foreign real estate. Was this ban really not there before?
Kondratyuk N. F. Currently, the FSO has a number of water-related facilities, but they are small, ship berths, firstly, which serve the head of state.
As for this formulation, here the question is understood as, if in this territory, well, a ship and auxiliary support and security vessels enter the port, then this place, it is, as it were, allocated for, say, car parking and security these ships. That's all.
Chairman. Maksimov Vasily Yurievich. Maksimov V. Yu., faction "UNITED RUSSIA".
Nikolai Fedorovich, a question for you. There is an interesting point here, an addition. Provide that citizens of the Russian Federation cannot be recruited or employed by state security bodies in the event of carrying out entrepreneurial activities. This is how it should be understood that if a person was once engaged in entrepreneurial activity, he cannot get into service in the FSO? Or how is this point generally interpreted?
Kondratyuk N.F. He cannot conduct business while in the service. That's what we're talking about.
Chairman. Vodolatsky Viktor Petrovich.
Vodolatsky V.P. Nikolay Fedorovich, there are FSO departments not only in Moscow, but also in other subjects and federal districts. Will these standards also apply to them? And wouldn’t there be some element of corruption here if the head of a department in some region uses airplanes and helicopters at his own discretion? Thank you.
Kondratyuk N.F. In all districts there are no helicopters or airplanes. They simply cannot be there a priori. And he must fulfill those requirements when preparing the events that we are now discussing.
Chairman. Alshevskikh Andrey Gennadievich.
Alshevskikh A.G., faction "UNITED RUSSIA".
Thank you.
Nikolai Fedorovich, tell me, the law was adopted quite a long time ago, in 1996, they say, and judging by the co-rapporteur’s speech, it has not been adjusted or edited for a long time. But, based on the wording, paragraph 4, what is in the following edition, well, like a new edition: protected objects, buildings, structures, structures, and of course, adjacent land plots, territories, water areas and so on, What is the situation regarding the airspace above these protected objects? Because today there are quite a lot of technical equipment that can be in the air, hover, film, and so on. That is, it’s like a question of this nature. Is this already reflected somewhere or is it advisable to stipulate that in addition to land plots and water areas, the air space above protected objects is also included?
Kondratyuk N.F. But the fact is that at the moment the legislation of the Russian Federation is such that we do not protect the airspace. The airspace is protected by the Ministry of Defense.
Chairman. Kolomeytsev Nikolay Vasilievich.
Kolomeytsev N.V. Thank you.
Question for Vasily Ivanovich.
Dear Vasily Ivanovich, given, say, the adoption of this law and a number of others on the primacy of the subordination of certain services to certain officials, is there a conflict between the special services here? And did you hold synchronized, perhaps closed, hearings, so as not to create a problem for the future at the border?
Piskarev V.I. Nikolai Vasilievich, there is no conflict in this situation. We have synchronized, everything is fine and you can rest assured that the law is targeted and exclusively aimed at increasing the efficiency of ensuring the protection of state security facilities.
Chairman. Marchenko Evgeniy Evgenievich. Marchenko E. E., faction "UNITED RUSSIA".
Nikolai Fedorovich, I have the following question. Here, a candidate for the position of security officer or security officer has large accounts payable, for example, he took out loans from a bank and does not repay them, has writs of execution for this debt, or, even worse, declares bankruptcy.
Don’t you consider it necessary to introduce this restriction into the law, so to speak, on hiring him to work in the Federal Security Service? Thank you.
Kondratyuk N.F. Your remark and proposal are interesting. Allow us to consider this in due course.
Chairman. Thank you. Will there be anyone willing to speak? Turn on recording mode. Show the list. Break until 12.30. Speeches after the break.
(Break)
(After the break)
Chairman of the State Duma V.V. Volodin presides
Chairman. Dear colleagues, please register.
Please enable registration mode. Please show your registration results.
Registration results (12 hours 31 minutes 05 seconds)
427 people present 94.9%
Absent 23 people 5.1%
There are 450 deputies in total.
Not registered 23 people 5.1%
Result: there is a quorum. There are 427 deputies present in the hall, 23 are absent, there is a quorum. Colleagues, we continue our consideration of issue 10. We stopped at performances.
Please, from "A JUST RUSSIA" Gartung Valery Karlovich.
Gartung V.K. Dear Vyacheslav Viktorovich! Dear Colleagues!
Of course, the bill introduced by the president is relevant, necessary and solves many problems that the state faces. At the same time, we have questions regarding the text of the bill. In particular, they have already been mentioned in the questions asked.
Well, first of all, we are talking about the fact that the FSO now has the authority to block roads, it does exist. Moreover, we know law enforcement practice, and we also know the reaction of citizens to this. Although according to the Constitution the number of protected persons is limited, nevertheless, by presidential orders this list is expanded. And law enforcement practice is such that it causes extreme irritation for motorists when they are stuck in hour-long traffic jams and, strictly speaking, we probably need to take some measures in order to somehow resolve this situation.
As for the highest officials of the state, that is, as far as I know, this problem is being solved in alternative ways.
Well, as for other protected persons, unfortunately, it is probably because of their passage that people suffer the most.
And the second note. This applies to the use of private infrastructure: airfields, heliports, ports, and so on, free of charge. Well, this may seem like an extreme situation, but if you judge by the letter of the law, as written here, then in fact, under the pretext of necessary needs, you can actually block the work of any such infrastructure facility that is privately owned and actually liquidate it as a business.
So that such extremes are even theoretically impossible... I understand that maybe this is an extreme position, an extreme situation, but so that even theoretically there is no such possibility, it seems to me that by the second reading it will be necessary to look at this situation and refine it . In general, A JUST RUSSIA supports this bill in the first reading. Thank you.
Chairman. Please, Valeev Ernest Abdulovich, "UNITED RUSSIA".
Valeev E. A., faction "UNITED RUSSIA".
Dear Vyacheslav Viktorovich! Dear Colleagues!
First of all, it should be noted that the bill does not contain any legal innovations that would be included in our legal system. As already noted, the law “On State Protection” was adopted in 1996. After this, legislation on civil service was formed in the country, restrictions and prohibitions were introduced for civil servants, an anti-corruption legislative package was formed, adjustments were made to the powers of all law enforcement agencies: the law “On the Police”, the law “On the Federal Security Service”, the law “On the State Security Service”. border." And all this, of course, requires introducing corresponding changes to the law “On State Protection”.
Therefore, all changes introduced and proposed are contained in other laws of the Russian Federation, and the law “On State Protection” is brought into line with those laws that already exist. This is the first.
Second. The question of the need for additional discussion of the possibility of free use of airports due to the fact that since that time the order of ownership and ownership of airports, including private structures, has changed, this point was noted in the conclusion of the committee, and in preparation for the second reading we We will certainly discuss the issue and make some decision.
In this regard, the UNITED RUSSIA faction proposes to support the bill. We will vote yes. Thank you.
Chairman. Thank you.
Would the Presidential Plenipotentiary would like to speak, please? No. Governments? No. The speaker's closing remarks. Nikolai Fedorovich, please.
Kondratyuk N. F. What can I say? I am very pleased that the deputies so carefully and carefully considered the law, which will work better in the work of the Federal Security Service.
Well, I think we will further refine all the comments for the second reading. Thanks a lot.
Chairman. Thank you, Nikolai Fedorovich.
Please have a final word from the co-speaker. Vasily Ivanovich?
Pet.
Dear colleagues, issue 10 of our agenda is being put to a vote - on the draft federal law “On Amendments to the Federal Law “On State Security” and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation.”
Turn on voting mode. Show the results.
Voting results (12 hours 37 minutes 16 seconds)
418 people voted for 92.9%
Voted against 0 people 0.0%
1 person abstained 0.2%
419 people voted.
31 people did not vote 6.9%
Result: adopted The bill was adopted in the first reading.
The Head of the Republic of Crimea, Sergei Aksyonov, took part in a gala event dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the formation of the security agencies of the Russian Federation. The event took place at the theater. A.P. Chekhov in Yalta.
The State Secretary and Deputy Director of the Security Service of the Russian Federation, Lieutenant General Nikolai Kondratyuk, and the Head of the Security Service in Crimea of the FSO of the Russian Federation, Yuri Basov, addressed those present and congratulated their colleagues on their professional holiday.
Then a film was shown about the difficulties of the FSO's work.
In his welcoming speech, Sergei Aksyonov congratulated the employees of the Russian security agencies on their professional holiday. The head of the republic noted that the Federal Security Service is one of the most important structures ensuring the security of the state and society.
“Dear security officials, the result of your work is brilliant. In Crimea, interaction has been achieved with the leadership of the FSO. I would like to express my gratitude to all colleagues and employees who work in ensuring security, protecting the state and generally solving state problems. For my part, I guarantee that the executive authorities will interact with you just as effectively. You and I have one task - to carry out the instructions of the President. Thank you very much for your work in Crimea!” - said the Head of Crimea.
Sergey Aksyonov also thanked the service veterans who pass on their invaluable experience to young employees.
During the event, speeches were made by the Deputy Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Southern Federal District, Kirill Stepanov, and the Deputy Chairman of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea, Efim Fiks.
Deputy head of the Federal Security Service (FSO) Nikolai Kondratyuk and his relatives own almost 1.85 hectares of land in the elite village of Znamenskie Prostori; the total value of the property could be about 894 million rubles, writes Republic, which studied data from Rosreestr and the declaration of the State Secretary services.
Kondratyuk himself owns only one plot, purchased in 2005 and indicated in the declaration (it can be downloaded), writes Republic. The remaining plots are registered to Gleb Nikolaevich and Oleg Nikolaevich Kondratyukov. Novaya Gazeta wrote in November 2018 that this is the name of Nikolai Kondratyuk’s sons, while the publication estimated the market value of the plots owned by the family at 300 million rubles.
In its calculations of the Kondratyuk family’s holdings, Republic also included the land of Gleb Kondratyuk’s neighbor, Olga Alexandrova. In reality, the plots are surrounded by one fence, and the house located there belongs equally to Kondratyuk and Alexandrova, the publication explained.
Two plots are empty, their total area is 6164 sq. m. m, and the cost is almost 130 million rubles, writes Republic. Another plot of 1500 sq. m General Kondratyuk sold in 2002, now its value is estimated at 31.5 million rubles, the media notes. Kondratyuk and Alexandrova have six houses, two of which are townhouses for two families, three more houses of 500 sq. m. m and land are estimated at 70 million rubles, 300 sq. m in a townhouse (half of the house) - 40 million rubles, the project provides prices. Another plot of 3459 sq. m and a house of 650 sq. m is not for sale, but realtors valued a similar dacha at 363 million rubles, Republic points out. With an annual income of almost 11.7 million rubles (this is what Kondratyuk earned on average in 2016-2018), it would take the general about 76 years to earn such real estate, Republic calculated.
The village of Znamenskiye Prosty is located a 10-minute drive from the presidential residence Novo-Ogarevo; many current and former intelligence officers live there, Republic points out.
In the summer of 2019, Kondratyuk and his sons sold an apartment on Osennyaya Street in Krylatskoye.
Gleb and Oleg Kondratyuk do not hold leadership positions in Russian companies and do not own shares in organizations, Republic writes with reference to the register of legal entities. The project notes that Gleb Kondratyuk registered as an individual entrepreneur in 2016, and in the last two years he has been investing in tenders for debtors’ property and city property. Republic notes that he made at least two purchases at a price significantly below the market price.
What is known about Kondratyuk
Nikolai Kondratyuk was born in 1954, worked all his life in the state security agencies, a Republic source close to the leadership of the FSB said. In 2002, together with his colleagues in the FSO, he established the non-profit partnership “Zarya”, which in August 2003 bought land plots in the village of Soloslovo in the Moscow region from the Gorki-2 agricultural complex, Novaya Gazeta wrote. Since the late 1990s, “Gorki-2” has been run by the Trinity company of David Yakobashvili and his Wimm-Bill-Dann partner Gavril Yushvaev. Kondratyuk was a key figure in Zarya, Novaya Gazeta’s sources claimed.
In the 2000s, Kondratyuk was seconded to the Moscow mayor's office as an assistant to mayor Yuri Luzhkov, and in 2007 he was relieved of his post. In 2008-2012, he headed the administration of the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region, leaving the position early. In 2014, he headed the FSO unit in Crimea, and in 2017 he became secretary of state and deputy director of the service, Republic lists.
I'm lucky with the Kremlin supply managers. In 1998-99, he investigated and published materials on the so-called “Mabetex Case” and the Swiss bank accounts of the Yeltsin family, where one of the main characters was the then head of the presidential administration, Pavel Borodin. After Borodin's resignation and the initiation of a criminal case, I drew attention to the exploits of his heir - the current presidential manager Vladimir Kozhin. Then, back in 2000, there was a small skating rink on Red Square, which for some reason cost the budget... a million dollars, and there was also the so-called State Unitary Enterprise “Kremlin”, through which billions of rubles passed.It seems that the position of the Kremlin supply manager is in itself a call for enrichment and at the same time a springboard for further initiation of criminal cases. Well, they can’t work calmly. Does not work. The temptation is probably very great. And the position of supply manager has been a grain one since Soviet times. And if the supply manager is from the Kremlin...
But let's finish the prefaces and move on to real estate. Moreover, the real estate is such that next to it, parliamentary and official villas in Miami and mansions in Europe pale in comparison.
So, on the golden Rublevo-Uspenskoye Highway at the entrance to the millionaires’ village called Gorki-10 there is a plot of land with cadastral number 41741:328. This piece of blessed land, with an area of 7.72 hectares, is located “less than 100 m from the Uspensky police department of the Odintsovo Directorate of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, on the eastern section of the hill, descending from the north to the Moscow River, and from the east to the river Vyazemka.
The territory of plot No. 41741:328 is surrounded by a metal fence made of green profiled sheets approximately 3 - 3.5 meters high. The entrance to the territory is equipped with automatic gates. Control of the perimeter, as well as the entrance gates, is carried out through a video surveillance system, which includes a large number of video cameras, and a system of motion sensors. Approximate length of the fence: along the bank of the Moscow River - 350 m, on the southern side, limited by the Rublevo-Uspenskoe Highway - 500 m, on the eastern side - 500 m and on the western side, along the border of the old state dacha - 500 m.”
Can you imagine the sizes? If it’s hard to imagine, then I suggest you look at the photographs. Yes, and also “On plot No. 41741:328 there are at least 6 buildings - of which two large houses are located in the northern part of the plot, on the ridge of the hill. Approximately 70% of its area is occupied by old forest. From the crest of the hill, rising approximately 20 meters above the bank of the Moscow River, a seven-flight staircase, decorated with welded metal railings, descends.”
Now let's talk about prices. I wonder how much such a plot in such a location cost in, say, post-crisis 2009 prices? Then one hundred square meters of land in Gorki-10 was sold for 70-75 thousand dollars. Accordingly, the price per hectare was 7 million dollars, and the required plot of 7.72 hectares cost no less than 50 million North American dollars.
And all that remains is to find out the name of the happy owner of this ruble land. Abramovich? No. Usmanov? Also no. This millionaire’s name is Vladimir Igorevich Kozhin, and since 2000 he has been in charge of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, that is, he is a government official. And Mr. Kozhin acquired almost 8 hectares of golden land in 2009. And again the question: Where did the official get 50 million dollars to purchase such real estate?
Have you asked? We answer. Mr. Kozhin bought plot No. 41741:328 with an area of 7.72 hectares on Rublevo-Uspenskoye Highway for (attention!) 162,110 rubles 79 kopecks. For those who do not understand, I repeat - one hundred sixty-two thousand one hundred ten rubles and seventy-nine kopecks. Or, at the Central Bank exchange rate, five thousand four hundred dollars. For all. For those in doubt, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the official document called “Calculation of the purchase price of a land plot.”
Some details about how it happened.
Before us is a power of attorney dated March 19, 2009, signed by Vladimir Viktorovich Kozhin, born February 28, 1959, in which he authorizes a certain Andrei Andreev to “purchase ownership in my name of a land plot of industrial lands, energy, transport, communications, lands for providing space activities, defense, security lands, and lands for other special purposes, with cadastral number 50:20:0041741-328, with location: Moscow region, Odintsovo district, Gorki-10 village, object “Gorki-10/3” with permitted use - for federal needs, with a total area of 77,199 sq. m."
At the same time, Deputy Head of the State Property Management Unit of the Moscow Region E.V. Medvedeva wrote to her management that the transfer of ownership of this plot to Kozhin was illegal, because The Land Code of the Russian Federation and water protection rules are violated, and the most important thing is that these lands are intended for federal needs, and not for the dacha pleasures of a high-ranking official. Letter from Mrs. Medvedeva in front of you:
However, despite the violation of everything possible, a plot of land for federal needs was sold (see price above) to Vladimir Kozhin on March 5, 2009. What is the order of the Territorial Administration of the Federal Agency for State Property Management for the Moscow Region No. 113.
After which, the plot was registered in the name of the owner - Vladimir Igorevich Kozhin. I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the title documents for Kozhin’s ownership of 7.72 hectares. By the way, the lands in some mysterious way suddenly turned from “federal needs” to “for dacha construction.” Magic, and that's all.
So, let's summarize. Head of the Presidential Administration Department V.I. In 2009, Kozhin purchased 7.72 hectares of land on Rublyovka, which cost at least $50 million, for 162,110 rubles 79 kopecks. That is, ten thousand times cheaper than the real cost. In addition, these lands were intended for federal needs and, accordingly, were not subject to sale at all. However, they ended up in the possession of a high-ranking official.
By the way, now the price of such real estate is off the charts for $100 million, and for some reason I associate this whole story with the corpus delicti provided for in Part 4 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud on an especially large scale). But this is my subjective opinion.
Vladimir Igorevich! How lucky you are! With such happiness, and in freedom.
Search by " Nikolay Kondratyuk". Results: Kondratyuk - 19, Nikolay - 5197.
results from 1 to 13 from 13 .
Searching results:
1. Putin’s personal security was built on Rublyovka. In 2014, Alexander Kolpakov was appointed manager of the presidential affairs of Russia; Alexander Kolpakov Sergei Shcherbakov, FSO Major General and President of the Moscow Federation “Universal Fight”; Sergey Shcherbakov Nikolai Kondratyuk. The first head of the FSO security service in Crimea from 2014 to 2017, and today - State Secretary and Deputy Director of the FSO. Nikolai Kondratyuk Exactly Kondratyuk, as several of his colleagues from the FSO told Novaya Gazeta on condition of anonymity, was the main character in...Date: November 20, 2018 2. Resort under the thumb of the UDP. Nikolai Kondratyuk- head of the FSO security service in Crimea.
Date: 04/22/2015 3. The man from the palace. The co-founders were three more FSO employees, including a certain Nikolai Kondratyuk. And this is where things start to get interesting. From 2008 to 2012 Nikolai Kondratyuk headed the administration of the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region, after which he moved to work “in the central apparatus of the FSO.”
Date: 06/16/2014 4. Vladimir Vdovichenkov was the first to hit the shooter. ... 11.2010 They are looking for the Yeltsins’ neighbor for the execution of Vdovichenkov Nikolai Kondratyuk Life News has learned the name of the owner of the jeep who fled on Wednesday from the scene of the shooting of 39-year-old actor Vladimir Vdovichenkov. According to documents, the Nissan X-Trail belongs to the head of the administration of the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region - a 53-year-old Nicholas Kondratyuk. By proxy, his 23-year-old son Oleg drives this car. […] It is noteworthy that Nikolai Kondratyuk is a neighbor of one of the most famous in Russia...
Date: 11/19/2010 5. Three houses, special communications, a helipad and an ice arena. Kozhin made this deal when the head of the administration of the Odintsovo district, which includes Gorki-10, was the current deputy head of the FSO, General Nikolai Kondratyuk. Earlier, Novaya Gazeta found plots of land in another area of Rublyovka - Gorki-2 - from the family of a federal security officer. But, as Project found out, the source is Rosreestr data, Nicholas and Alla Kondratyuk owned 3.6 thousand square meters since 2002. m of land here, in Gorki-10.. Now only Alla owns them Kondratyuk, judging by the fact that the plot passed to her through marriage...
Date: 05/23/2019 6. Declarations of officials of the Presidential Administration - 2016. Mr. Kolpakov, according to the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, remained a co-founder of non-profit partnerships near Moscow - the NP of individual developers "Znamenskie Prostory" in "Gorki-2" and the NP of land users "Zarya" in Odintsovo , Mrs. Kolpakova is a member of the HOA “On Osennyaya” in Moscow (in all three legal entities their partner is the ex-head of the administration of the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region Nikolai Kondratyuk).
Date: 05/22/2017 7. The heads of the special services reported on income for 2018 - K.ru insert] In second place among the heads of the special services is the Deputy Director of the FSO (State Secretary) Nikolai Kondratyuk, who indicated in the declaration an income of 24.3 million rubles. The document does not explain the origin of these funds.
Date: 05/06/2019 8. Spanish cell of Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeev) for €1 million. Nikolai Gorelov, having lost his son and wife and was left without a livelihood, became seriously ill and needed help. This, so to speak, is the humanitarian price of the magnificent Russian temple in Spanish Altea. During the time after the consecration, due to the conflicting nature of the owner, the temple changed 5 abbots. The penultimate of them is Fr. Adam Kondratyuk- fled to the neighboring city of Benidorm, where “from scratch” he began to build a temple in the name of St. Seraphim of Sarov.
Date: 12/24/2019 9. Four apartments in Moscow, two hectares of land in the Moscow region. Among the local residents, Republic found numerous people from the Federal Security Service and their families: the head of the presidential affairs, the brothers of the governors of the Tula and Yaroslavl regions, a probable relative of the head of the security service, Dmitry Medvedev, and the main landowners turned out to be the state secretary of the FSO Nikolai Kondratyuk and his sons.
Date: 09/24/2019 10. Little Crimea for big people. Formally, it only limits certain types of activities, for example, it prohibits the construction of permanent structures without the permission of the FSO. Security zone around state dachas But in fact, residents of Oliva now cannot register their houses and land: in October 2016, the head of the FSO in Crimea Nikolai Kondratyuk- headed the Security Service in Crimea from 2014 to 2017, later took the post of deputy director of the FSO - sent a letter to the Crimean branch of Rosreestr with a request not to be included in the unified cadastral database (USRN...
Date: 12/11/2019 11.